Re: [O] [RFC] new :post header argument for post-processing of code block results

[Andreas Leha]

Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:

> Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Eric Schulte <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been wanting to add the ability to post-process the results of a
>>> code block for some time, and some recent threads (e.g., [1] and [2])
>>> could both have benefited from post-processing of code block output.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> Does this new header argument seem useful?  Any suggestions for better
>>> syntax which don't add too much conceptual or code complexity?
>>
>> Very useful indeed!  I don't have a chance to try this out properly now
>> but I know of several previous org files where this would have been very
>> useful.
>>
>
> Great, I'm happy I wasn't the only one.
>

No, you were not.  Adding lines to tables is one of the cases, I will
use that cool feature from now on.

Regards,
Andreas