[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug? |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:56:19 +0200 |
On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:56, Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 06.06.2013 10:44, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
>>
>> On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:30, Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>> Am 06.06.2013 10:11, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
>>>>
>>>> On 6 jun. 2013, at 09:58, Andreas Röhler <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm misusing org-mode for a review of (slightly transformed) diffs as
>>>>> below.
>>>>> When done, want to delete the current section.
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunatly a call of M-x `org-cut-subtree' not just deletes the current
>>>>> section, but also
>>>>> deletes the header-start of section beneath.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Andreas,
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure I understand the problem. What do you mean by header-start
>>>> of section?
>>>>
>>>> - Carsten
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The star, `*', introducing the header below. Which get's killed.
>>
>>
>> I am not able to reproduce this.
>>
>> - Carsten
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>
>>
>
> Okay, registered a kbd-macro which restores the star. Fine for me.
I would still be interested if anyone else sees this problem.
- Carsten
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Andreas
>
>
- [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/06/06
- Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/06/06
- Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/06/06
- Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/06/06
- Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/06/06
- Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?,
Carsten Dominik <=
- Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/06/06
- Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?, Andreas Röhler, 2013/06/10
- Re: [O] org-cut-subtree, bug?, Carsten Dominik, 2013/06/10