[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=. |
Date: |
Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:21:43 +0200 |
Hello,
Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> feng shu <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> From 63eba2e491a0c410b3841cbad2dd1a9f80416bca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Feng Shu <address@hidden>
>>> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 11:52:10 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] Let =`make'= be an option to =`org-latex-pdf-process'=.
>>>
>>> * ox-latex.el (org-latex-pdf-process): let =`make'= be a
>>> preconfigured choice and change the wording of the docstring.
>>
>> I don't mind applying it, but shouldn't it as simple to provide
>> a function that will call "make" instead?
>>
>> It's impossible to provide every solution in the wild for that. Is this
>> one really necessary: it doesn't have complicated arguments.
>
> Can (other ...) be used here? See (info "(elisp) Composite Types")
AFAIU, `other' means "whatever your answer is, always do the same",
which is not what we want.
If you want "give whatever you want and we'll use it", it should be
a `string' type. But can't `function', which is already implemented, do
the same anyway?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou