emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Handling Repeating events from google calendar / repeater interv


From: Guido Van Hoecke
Subject: Re: [O] Handling Repeating events from google calendar / repeater interval
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 17:55:26 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin)

Hu Stephen,

Stephen Eglen <address@hidden> writes:

> I'm experimenting using ical2org.sh to import google calendars.  One
> limitation, as noted in the header is:
>
> # - does process RRULE recurring events, but ignores COUNT specifiers
>
> so if you have a repeating event in google (e.g. every day for four
> week), the ics file has:
>
> RRULE:FREQ=DAILY;COUNT=4
>
> The script will take the first day of the event, but not the remaining
> three days.  I think this could be solved in a couple of ways:
>
> 1. create four events, moving the date by one each time.

Correct me if I am wrong, but I'm afraid that pure AWK does not provide
date computation support. That's why I did not implement this.
So I would definitely vote to extend the repeater syntax with a count.

>
> 2. extending the syntax of timestamps so that something like:
>
>           * Pick up Sam at school
>             <2007-05-16 Wed 12:30 3+1w>
>
> means repeat this event 3 times (rather than indefinitely).  Or
> "+1w:3"

I assume that your initial example RRULE would require either "...4+1d>"
or "+1d:4"

> or something similar, I don't mind the syntax as long as it doesn't
> break other parts of timestamps.
>
> Has extending the syntax of the repeater interval been considered to
> allow finite number of repeats?  I can offer to code something up for
> consideration if this sounds sensible.

+1


Guido

--
We're constantly being bombarded by insulting and humiliating music, which
people are making for you the way they make those Wonder Bread products.
Just as food can be bad for your system, music can be bad for your spirtual
and emotional feelings.  It might taste good or clever, but in the long run,
it's not going to do anything for you.
                -- Bob Dylan, "LA Times", September 5, 1984



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]