emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] Restore raw output in LaTeX export from in-line code block


From: Liam Healy
Subject: Re: [O] Restore raw output in LaTeX export from in-line code block
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2013 19:36:19 -0400

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Eric Schulte <address@hidden> wrote:
> Liam Healy <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I noticed that raw results from in-line code blocks were disappearing in
>> the new LaTeX exporter, and bisected the repo to the change 7117ad4f92. I
>> have created the attached patch to fix the problem and restore the previous
>> behavior.
>>
>> example file
>>       * Test
>>         1. Inline common lisp raw: src_lisp[:results raw]{(+ 2 2)}, should
>> say 4.
>>
>>
>> Desired output, restored by patch
>>   \item Inline common lisp raw: 4, should say 4.
>> Output without patch
>>    \item Inline common lisp raw: , should say 4.
>>
>> If this looks right, please apply.
>>
>> Liam
>>
>
> Hi Liam,
>
> You're actually noticing a symptom of an error in the way lisp code
> blocks were handling results (conflating the output/results and the
> scalar/vector distinction).  I've just pushed up a fix, please let me
> know if you continue to see these types of errors.
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Eric Schulte
> https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte
> PGP: 0x614CA05D

Thanks Eric. Indeed, your patches work to produce the correct output
for that case. Now I have another problem. I'm really not interested
in producing "4" of course, what I do is use lisp to produce LaTeX.
For example,

+ Inline common lisp raw: $src_lisp[:results raw]{(format nil
"\\sqrt{2~c" (code-char 125))}$, should say "$\sqrt{2}$".

Which used to produce (Org-mode version 7.9.4) the right thing,
\item Inline common lisp raw: $\sqrt{2}$, should say ``$\sqrt{2}$".
and now (Org-mode version 8.2.1) doesn't evaluate the lisp,
\item Inline common lisp raw: $src_lisp[:results raw]{(format nil
"\\sqrt{2~c" (code-char 125))}$, should say "$\sqrt{2}$".

Is this a bug? How do I restore the evaluation of the src_lisp in this context?

Thanks.
Liam



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]