[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [BUG] Exporting to HTML a document with a #+CALL
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [BUG] Exporting to HTML a document with a #+CALL |
Date: |
Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:39:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Vladimir Lomov <address@hidden> writes:
> Hello,
> ** Eric Schulte [2013-10-22 08:44:18 -0600]:
>
>> This issue only manifests with the Emacs compiled from source, and as
>> such I can not reproduce it.
>
>> If this bug makes it into a released version of Emacs I can address it
>> then. Until then perhaps this should be reported to the emacs-dev list.
>
> I found which revision introduced this behaviour (114069) but I don't
> know how to prepare minimal example which would show incorrect behaviour
> and wouldn't use Org syntax. Is that possible at all?
I have been wondering the same thing for over a month now. This problem
has been present in the snapshots of Emacs since early September. I
haven't run into the problem in any non-org use of Emacs
unfortunately. There's something about calls in babel that exercises
the buffer management in Emacs more than other uses.
> Nevertheless, I'll try to write a bug report based on Org example but
> only tomorrow.
>
> P.S. I suppose there must be another problem commit because error
> message was changed somewhere between commits 114100 and 114200, I don't
> have time right now to dig deeper.
Which is why I believe you thought you had a different problem than the
one I reported back in September! I'm glad you've tracked this down as
well. Keep us posted.
Thanks,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 24.3.50.1, Org release_8.2.1-87-g8e841c