[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [Bug] commit 39070b7fc7 breaks babel test
From: |
Bastien |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [Bug] commit 39070b7fc7 breaks babel test |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:48:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Skip,
Skip Collins <address@hidden> writes:
> Designating something as an expected failure seems to be a good way to
> track minor issues that need eventually to be resolved. As a user, I
> frequently update with make up2 just to avoid getting bitten by stupid
> errors that might sneak into master. Is it really that much extra work
> for a developer to run the same command before committing and either
> fix the error or mark it as a known failure?
I'm for a relaxed policy here.
Users living on the master branch know they are testing an unstable
version of Org, and such hiccups just happen.
--
Bastien