[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something
From: |
N. Jackson |
Subject: |
[O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Feb 2014 13:12:00 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
> address@hidden (N. Jackson) writes:
>
>> Ah, that sounds like the start of a new adventure...
>>
>> ... which went _far_ more smoothly than I expected! I am now testing
>> with GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 Repository revision: 116400 and Org-mode
>> version 8.2.5c.
>
> Yes, sorry, I meant "emacs -Q" in my recipes.
>
> I can't reproduce the bug with GNU Emacs 24.3.50.6, so it has probably
> been fixed between 24.3.50.1 and 24.3.50.6.
Bastien, you misunderstood what I wrote (sorry).
I _did_ build 24.3.50(.1) from the current (yesterday's) trunk from
Bazaar.
And, assuming the failure of shift selection in cua-mode _is_ the bug
the OP was reporting (I was never clear about that), then the bug _is_
fixed using that build, as I wrote here:
>> In any case, with both recipes, Org behaves correctly in 24.3.50.1.
and here:
>> emacs -Q
>> M-: (org-support-shift-select t) RET
>> M-x cua-mode RET ; Turn _on_ cua mode
>> C-x C-f new-test.org RET
>> a
>> S-<left> ; Expected: "a" is selected / highlighted
>> C-x ; Expected: "a" is removed to the clipboard
>> In Emacs 24.3.1 (as, I believe, in Emacs 23), the S-<left> just moves
>> the cursor, no selection is highlighted, and the C-x fails to remove
>> the "a" to the clipboard. This defect is fixed in Emacs 24.3.50.1. :)
^^^^^^^^
> I'll close it when you have a chance to build Emacs from current
> trunk.
Lennart, I believe you were the original poster? Is the one above the
bug you intended to report? (I was confused by the discussion of
org-replace-disputed-keys, which doesn't seem to be a factor here.) And
if so, do you want to test on 24.3.50, or are you satisfied that the bug
is fixed?
> Thanks again for the detailed reports!
You're welcome, but clearly I need to improve my clarity! Thank you for
being there to do something about them.
Regards,
N.
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2014/02/02
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, Bastien, 2014/02/09
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, Lennart Borgman, 2014/02/09
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, Bastien, 2014/02/09
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, N. Jackson, 2014/02/11
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, Bastien, 2014/02/10
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, N. Jackson, 2014/02/11
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, N. Jackson, 2014/02/11
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, Bastien, 2014/02/11
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something,
N. Jackson <=
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, Bastien, 2014/02/11
- [O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something, Lennart Borgman, 2014/02/11
- Prev by Date:
[O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something
- Next by Date:
[O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something
- Previous by thread:
[O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something
- Next by thread:
[O] bug#5753: something, something, org-mode, shift-select, something
- Index(es):