Re: [O] [PATCH] Fixed bug in org-entry-get-with-inheritance

[Achim Gratz]

Bastien writes:
> What I meant is this: broken tests are not a sufficient reason to
> revert a commit.  You need to show the commit is wrong and the tests
> are not outdated.

No code breaking a test should have been committed in the first place,
then we wouldn't need to have this discussion.  If the "tests are
outdated" (in this case they ensure that the documentation and
implementation are matching up which is difficult to ascertain by just
playing with a single example, so that shouldn't ever happen), the onus
is on the committer to explain why and change the tests and
documentation accordingly (either as a preparation for that commit or in
the same commit).


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptation for Waldorf Blofeld V1.15B11:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada