[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?
From: |
Alan Schmitt |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Apr 2014 15:37:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) |
On 2014-04-29 15:31, Bastien <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi Samuel,
>
> Samuel Loury <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> In that case, OBJECT is not the current buffer but a string called
>> 'a'. Thus, IIUC, it makes no sense to use OBJECT=a and
>> POSITION=(point-min).
>
> Indeed. It should be 0 in this case, thanks for spotting this,
Thanks a lot indeed. I'll fix this. I have no idea why it worked in my
case ...
Alan
- [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Rene, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Richard Lawrence, 2014/04/27
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Rene, 2014/04/28
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Samuel Loury, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Alan Schmitt, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Samuel Loury, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Bastien, 2014/04/29
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?,
Alan Schmitt <=
- Re: [O] Is OrgMode really GTD compliant?, Bastien, 2014/04/29