Re: [O] mis-alignment in org-tables with Tibetan characters

[Bastien]

Hi Eric,

Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden> writes:

> Sorry this took a while to get to...
>
> I think it was a little simpler than I thought -- at least I hope that's
> true, and I'm not missing something really obvious. There are two
> patches attached, a simple one that handles re-justification of table
> fields during field movement, and another that allows for narrowing of
> columns with double-width strings. The second patch is uglier, and
> doesn't work 100% well (you get misalignment if you try to narrow a
> double-wide to an odd number of single-width characters), but it's
> better than nothing.

I want to apply the patches on master -- can you give them a commit
message with an Emacs changelog?  Also, the first one (0001-...) does
not apply on master anymore.

Thanks in advance!

-- 
 Bastien