[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties
From: |
Nicolas Girard |
Subject: |
Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2014 21:34:11 +0200 |
2014-06-12 21:21 GMT+02:00 Nicolas Girard <address@hidden>:
> 2014-06-12 20:54 GMT+02:00 Aaron Ecay <address@hidden>:
>> Hi Eric, hi all,
>
>
> I also ran across this need. What I had in mind was that certain todo
> types would be treated as inline.
> For instance, if "P" was a member of this hypothetical
> org-inline-todo-keywords, then
>
> * P a paragraph
> some contents
>
> would be rendered as
>
> some contents
>
> by the exporter, no matter the backend.
>
> Such a feature is more generic and would be useful in other contexts ;
> and the LaTeX-related issues discussed in this thread would be solved
> using something like
>
> * INLINE appendix
> \appendix
> * Appendix 1
>
>
Or, even better: rendering *both* the headline *and* the body of
lnline nodes as inline contents too:
* INLINE My inline
contents
--> My inline contents
* INLINE \appendix
--> \appendix
Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties, Eric Schulte, 2014/06/12
Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties, Ken Mankoff, 2014/06/12
Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties, Eric Schulte, 2014/06/12
Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties, Ken Mankoff, 2014/06/12
Re: [O] proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties, Eric Schulte, 2014/06/13