Re: [O] if we operate on a subtree, perhaps we could adjust levels

[Achim Gratz]

Bastien writes:
>> 2. Demote the whole subtree to toplevel before encryption and promote
>> into the correct level on decryption, (much in the same way that
>> includes are handled).
>
> By "correct level on decryption" you mean toplevel?  This would really
> circumvent the problem.

Not sure what you mean by toplevel, but the way includes are handled is
to check at what level the include is happening and promote the included
content to that level.  That would also make the encrypted subtree
independent of any movements in the hierarchy, which is IMHO desirable.

> Maybe we can store the level in a property on encryption and simply
> throw a warning on decryption, letting the user decide whether she
> wants to continue decrypting even when it may break the hierarchy.

FWIW, I prefer the other solution since it is more general.  Again, the
content from the decryption process can be treated like an include
(except for display rather than during export) or rather an "inline
file", which might be worth having independently of encrypted subtree as
well.


Regards,
Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

Wavetables for the Waldorf Blofeld:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#BlofeldUserWavetables