Re: [O] [RFC] Block switches as #+HEADER: args?

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Thorsten Jolitz <address@hidden> writes:

> Thats what I thought, but wouldn't it be nicer to treat switches and
> header args more uniformly here?

Header arguments are for Babel consumption. Switches are not. I see no
reason to treat them similarly.

> Otherwise custom solutions are needed to store the switches in some
> place when nuking the surrounding #+begin/#+end lines in a conversion
> process, and restore them again when converting back to Org. Or the
> switches-info is simply lost during conversion.

Since you already store header args, it isn't much difficult to also
store switch, is it?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou