Is there some change in the status of this issue? Can one now specify the language of the result?
Cheers,
Dror
----------
Mahalo Tom,
It looks like that's what I'll be doing for the ruby block. That said, it
would be great if the :results code argument would allow a language
specification.
Greg
On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:22 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Greg Tucker-Kellogg <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I have a Ruby block that creates some dot code. I'd like to be able
>> to have the #+RESULTS block enclosed
>> in a src block that starts "#+BEGIN_SRC dot". Using :results value
>> code generates the enclosing SRC block,
>> but using the same language (Ruby) used to generate the code. Is
>> there a way to specify the coding language
>> of a generated #+RESULTS src block?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Greg
>>
> Aloha Greg,
>
> This works for me with an emacs-lisp code block named harris-matrix that
> generates dot code.
>
> #+header: :var input=harris-matrix
> #+header: :file temp.pdf
> #+header: :cmdline -Tpdf
> #+header: :results output
> #+BEGIN_SRC dot
> $input
> #+END_SRC
>
> It's not quite what you were after, but it might help?
>
> All the best,
> Tom
>
> --
> Thomas S. Dye