[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Oct 2014 11:43:38 +0200 |
Hello,
Fabrice Popineau <address@hidden> writes:
> Given that it is only a matter of presentation, does that mean it could be
> changed ?
> If yes, I can try to give it a shot.
If you mean that a^bc should be equivalent to a^{b}c, then I think it is
superior in its current state.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- [O] Exponents / subscripts, Fabrice Popineau, 2014/10/19
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/10/19
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Fabrice Popineau, 2014/10/19
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Rasmus, 2014/10/20
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/10/21
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Rasmus, 2014/10/21
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/10/22
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Rasmus, 2014/10/22
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/10/23
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Rasmus, 2014/10/23
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Nicolas Goaziou, 2014/10/23
- Re: [O] Exponents / subscripts, Fabrice Popineau, 2014/10/22