Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal

[Rasmus]

Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

>> Perhaps the difference is too subtle.  Note that you would never deal with
>> a `citation' other than through a mapping.
>
> Hmm. I still find `citations/citation' pair confusing. What about
> `citation/part'?

So (citation ⋯ :parts ((part ⋯) (part ⋯))).  Fine with me.  Other
possibilities are citation/entry and :entries.  Or less nice:
citation/cite and :cites.

>> Right, I was trying *to add* support for address@hidden; ⋯;@kN].
>
> Please don't. Let's keep shortcuts simple.

It would enable "complicated argument address@hidden;@k2;@k3]", which is pretty
nice.  There's still no pre and post notes etc, only keys.

—Rasmus

-- 
Together we'll stand, divided we'll fall