[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Config best practices?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Config best practices? |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Mar 2015 00:18:51 +0100 |
On 2015-03-20, at 10:07, Sebastien Vauban <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello Marcin,
>
> Marcin Borkowski wrote:
>> I'm wondering what people do to keep the configuration of their Org
>> files in order.
>
> I'm not sure to correctly grasp your objective. Could you restate it?
Sure.
Where do you put things like
#+OPTIONS: toc:nil
or
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO | DONE
or
#+LATEX_HEADER: \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}
?
>> I use a dedicated top-level headline, with a COMMENT keyword, but
>> I started to think that a :noexport: tag might be a better idea.
>>
>> Are there any advantages of one over the other, or other approaches
>> altogether?
>
> I can tell you they aren't isomorphic... The noexport tag simply says
> "don't export this subtree". The COMMENT keyword adds "don't run any
> Babel code block in there".
So I guess that – since the lines with options etc. are not exported
anyway – that using a :noexport: tag might be a better idea. Am I right?
>> The reason I'm asking is that I'm tweaking my org-one-to-many utility
>> so that it propagates the config to all the generated files.
>
> Still not that clear to me. Maybe an ECM would clarify your request?
As you wish. This is what I usually do.
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* Headline
* Another one
** Subheadline
* COMMENT Config
#+LATEX_HEADER: \newcommand{\eps}{\varepsilon}
#+SEQ_TODO: TODO | DONE CANCEL
#+OPTIONS: toc:nil
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
> Best regards,
> Seb
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University