Re: [O] [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:

> Point is moved, though.  If narrow shouldn't be "broken" then point
> shouldn't be moved.  I.e. no move when the definition is not within the
> buffer.

Fixed in 5954f6aa25b51a3a9a8f258fb0f15ef51be31366. Thank you.

>> Outside of the most trivial case (i.e., jump back and forth between the
>> definition and one of its references) it sounds like it would quickly
>> get in the way.
>
> It would only work for the most trivial case I guess.

This is why it is not worth implementing.


Regards,