[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] bisected
From: |
Nicolas Richard |
Subject: |
Re: [O] bisected |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:05:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Gregor Zattler <address@hidden> writes:
> First bad commit is:
> bad0409c3b86e09c4559e97d5f394356c6ccbe7f
Nice hash for a "bad" commit :)
> This results in a startup error:
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable write-back)
Is it related to your initial problem ?
I think this specific bug was fixed in :
Commit ea575950d957fcecc74ed6f53c29bb6b77e9fe26
modified lisp/org-src.el
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ (define-minor-mode org-src-mode
(org-set-local
'header-line-format
(substitute-command-keys
- (if write-back
+ (if org-src--allow-write-back
"Edit, then exit with \\[org-edit-src-exit] or abort with \
\\[org-edit-src-abort]"
"Exit with \\[org-edit-src-exit] or abort with \
--
Nico
- [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Detlef Steuer, 2015/04/30
- [O] bisected (was: )Re: "not in sub-editing buffer", Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] bisected, Bastien, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] bisected,
Nicolas Richard <=
- [O] wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
- [O] now it get's ridiculous: bug is still there (was: Re: wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected)), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
Re: [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Bastien Guerry, 2015/04/30