[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] bisected
|
From: |
Gregor Zattler |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] bisected |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 12:53:04 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) |
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Richard <address@hidden> [30. Apr. 2015]:
> Gregor Zattler <address@hidden> writes:
> > First bad commit is:
> > bad0409c3b86e09c4559e97d5f394356c6ccbe7f
>
> Nice hash for a "bad" commit :)
I didn't realise :-)
> > This results in a startup error:
> > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable write-back)
>
> Is it related to your initial problem ?
I don't know. It appeared while git bisecting.
> I think this specific bug was fixed in :
> Commit ea575950d957fcecc74ed6f53c29bb6b77e9fe26
Sorry, no:
with:
GNU Emacs 25.0.50.6 (i686-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.5) of
2015-04-27 on boo Org-mode version 8.3beta (release_8.3beta-1097-gea5759 @
/home/grfz/src/org-mode/lisp/)
and emacs invoked with -Q I cannot save a modified file with ^x ^s
but when I leave emacs:
receipt:
emacs -Q -nw /tmp/tempfile
change buffer, do ^x ^s.
Thanks for looking into this, Gregor
- [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Detlef Steuer, 2015/04/30
- [O] bisected (was: )Re: "not in sub-editing buffer", Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] bisected, Bastien, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] bisected, Nicolas Richard, 2015/04/30
- [O] wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
- [O] now it get's ridiculous: bug is still there (was: Re: wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected)), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
Re: [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Bastien Guerry, 2015/04/30