[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] bisected
|
From: |
Detlef Steuer |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] bisected |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Apr 2015 14:12:03 +0200 |
Am Thu, 30 Apr 2015 11:59:32 +0200
schrieb Bastien <address@hidden>:
> There was a hidden clue the commit could be problematic...
>
> Gregor Zattler <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > First bad commit is:
> > bad0409c3b86e09c4559e97d5f394356c6ccbe7f
> ^^^
That must be a first look at the singularity.
"The git" knows it all.
I for one welcome our new git overlord :-)
>
> !
>
>
>
- [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Detlef Steuer, 2015/04/30
- [O] bisected (was: )Re: "not in sub-editing buffer", Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] bisected, Bastien, 2015/04/30
- Re: [O] bisected,
Detlef Steuer <=
- Re: [O] bisected, Nicolas Richard, 2015/04/30
- [O] wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
- [O] now it get's ridiculous: bug is still there (was: Re: wrong test, fix works, sorry (was: Re: bisected)), Gregor Zattler, 2015/04/30
Re: [O] "not in sub-editing buffer", Bastien Guerry, 2015/04/30