[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt is em
From: |
John Hendy |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt is empty) |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Nov 2015 19:29:52 -0600 |
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 6:18 PM, Cook, Malcolm <address@hidden> wrote:
> I just noticed that upon editing a table formula, C-u C-c C-c was updating
> all but the first instance of formula (all but the first row).
>
> Org-mode version 8.3.2
>
> Could this be related issue?
If it was, I can't reproduce it with the latest pull that fixed my
reported issue (I'm now on Org-mode version 8.3.2
(release_8.3.2-342-g50359f @ /home/jwhendy/.elisp/org.git/lisp/)).
In my test, I used =$-1 + 2 for a column formula in row 1, populated
the column with C-u C-c C-c, and then changed row 3's entry to =$-1 +
3. Issuing C-u C-c C-c properly updated all rows.
John
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: address@hidden [mailto:emacs-
> > address@hidden On Behalf Of John Hendy
> > Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 5:57 PM
> > To: John Hendy <address@hidden>; emacs-orgmode <emacs-
> > address@hidden>
> > Subject: Re: [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt
> > is empty)
> >
> > Confirmed fixed -- thanks!
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden>
> > wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > John Hendy <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > >> I was just creating a table and using a formula, finding that C-c =
> > >> did not bring up the formula, but acted like I was inputting one for
> > >> the first time. I created a min-config and test file to see if this
> > >> was something related to my setup, but it seems I can reproduce.
> > >>
> > >> Org-mode version 8.3.2 (release_8.3.2-338-g522ec9 @
> > >> /home/jwhendy/.elisp/org.git/lisp/)
> > >>
> > >> #+begin_src min-config
> > >> ;; set load paths
> > >> ;; set load dirs and global config options
> > >> (add-to-list 'load-path "~/.elisp/org.git/lisp/")
> > >> (add-to-list 'load-path "~/.elisp/org.git/contrib/lisp")
> > >> #+end_src
> > >>
> > >> Emacs started with =emacs -Q=, followed by =M-x load-file RET
> > >> ~/Desktop/min-config RET=
> > >>
> > >> #+begin_src table-test.org
> > >>
> > >> * Headline
> > >>
> > >> | something | something else |
> > >> |-----------+----------------|
> > >> | 1 | 3 |
> > >> | 2 | |
> > >> | 3 | |
> > >> | 4 | |
> > >> #+TBLFM: $2=1+2
> > >>
> > >> #+end_src
> > >>
> > >> I created the contents in row 1 col 2 by entering "=1+2 RET". With
> > >> cursor in row 2 col 2, I press C-c = and see the attached (empty
> > >> prompt for a column 2 formula). If I type in 1+2 and press return, the
> > >> TBLFM line changes to:
> > >>
> > >> #+TBLFM: $2=1+2::$$2=1+2
> > >>
> > >> If I go to row 3 and C-c = again, pressing RET to accept the default
> > >> (maybe the formula is "stored" but just not displayed?), it changes to
> > >> (and nothing is put in row 3 col 2):
> > >>
> > >> #+TBLFM: $$2=1+2
> > >>
> > >> If I go to row 4 and do this one more time, pressing RET with empty
> > >> formula, it leaves an empty TBLFM line under the table.
> > >
> > > Fixed. Thank you.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Nicolas Goaziou
>
- [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt is empty), John Hendy, 2015/11/23
- Re: [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt is empty), Nicolas Goaziou, 2015/11/23
- Re: [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt is empty), John Hendy, 2015/11/23
- Re: [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt is empty), Cook, Malcolm, 2015/11/23
- Re: [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt is empty),
John Hendy <=
- Re: [O] Table formula bug? (TBLFM line populated, but C-c = prompt is empty), Cook, Malcolm, 2015/11/24