Re: [O] Bug: :export results does not replace previous results designated block

[Charles Millar]

On 02/23/2016 09:44 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Charles Millar <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On 02/22/2016 03:17 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > Charles Millar <address@hidden> writes:
> > >
> > > > The last time (last Wednesday or so) I executed the following code
> > > >
> > > > ** Some subheading
> > > > #+NAME: SCHEDAP
> > > > #+begin_src rec :data foo.rec :type Finance :fields
> > > > AssetDate,Description,Basis :results silent
> > > >     (File = 'Estate' && AccountSchedule = 'A')
> > > > #+end_src
> > > > #+RESULTS: SCHEDAP
> > > > #+NAME: SCHEDA
> > > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp :var table=SCHEDAP :exports results
> > > >      (setq table (cons 'hline table))
> > > >      (setq table (cons '("Date" "Description" "Inventory Value") table))
> > > >      (setq table (append table '(("|Total Schedule A"))))
> > > >      (setq table (append table '(("\n#+TBLFM:
> > > > @>$>=vsum(@I$>..@>>$>);%.2f::"))))
> > > >      table
> > > > #+end_src
> > > > #+ATTR_LATEX: :mode table :environment longtable :align
> > > > p{60pt}p{300pt}N{8}{2}
> > > > #+TBLNAME: SCHEDA
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > Should I change the code blocks or is this a bug? All of tables
> > > > generated by the same or similar code behave the same way - a table
> > > > after #+RESULTS: foobar is , but nothing for #+TBLNAME: foobar.
> > > What happens if you replace TBLNAME with NAME?
> > Same results. I have avoided changing TBLNAME to NAME, though I am not
> > sure if I have any reason other than habit.
> The problem is that TBLNAME is deprecated and very confusing.
>
> Actually, here, you seem to be using it as #+RESULTS: (which is
> different from #+NAME). You should replace it with #+RESULTS, since you
> want to insert the /results/ of "SCHEDA" code evaluation below.
Thanks, Nicolas.

I'll change all TBLNAME's to RESULTS; it seems to work. (There are files 
that go back to 2010 or so.)

I was aware of the deprecation; it just that I was getting away with 
using TBLNAME and hoped that I could continue to do so. Well, it caught 
up with me in the past four or five days.

Charlie