[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer
|
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
|
Subject: |
Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer |
|
Date: |
Sat, 14 Jan 2017 18:52:52 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) |
Jonas Bernoulli <address@hidden> writes:
> I did notice myself that the two-space indentation for blocks that are part
> of a list element are reserved and also that one can do what you are
> suggesting here to keep the code-block as part of the list item while at
> the same time not get those two extra spaces. (By the way, I don't like
> that work-around.)
This is not really a work-around. If we want to preserve indentation, as
"-i" implies, we need a fixed point to compute it. Here it is column 0.
> However for me that's what happened for example blocks only. For source
> blocks I got an additional five spaces, for which I found no explanation.
> (The only indentation in the Org source before the code-block lines are the
> two part-of-a-list-element spaces.)
Could you show an ECM?
Regards,
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/01/03
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/01/03
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Charles C. Berry, 2017/01/03
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/01/14
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/01/14
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/01/14
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/01/14
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/01/14
- Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/01/14
Re: [O] Something like #+BIND but for the destination buffer, Jonas Bernoulli, 2017/01/14