[O] backporting changes to exported results for collaborative editing

[Samuel Wales]

suppose you export a subtree to ascii or html, and then a bunch of
people want to help you edit it.  obviously you want the changes back
in org.

obviously the best would be if you could give them the source,
complete with comments.  but assume that they are not computer people,
and not org people, and you don't want to give them your irrelevant
comments.

also assume you also don't want to give them your irrelevant tasks and
you do not use org-export-with-tasks.

it might be that i already know the answer: just do the best you can
with diff, and request small sets of changes at a time, or request
manual instructions for changes.  but perhaps you have ideas?

-- 
The Kafka Pandemic: <http://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com>

The disease DOES progress. MANY people have died from it. And ANYBODY
can get it -- at any time.

"You’ve really gotta quit this and get moving, because this is murder
by neglect." --- very true words by Johanna Kaiser spoken to US NIH in
conference call with Walter Koroshetz, NINDS director
<http://www.meaction.net/2017/02/03/pwme-people-with-me-are-being-murdered-by-neglect>

Denmark: free Karina Hansen NOW.
  UPDATE 2016-10: home, but not fully free