Re: [O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed?

[Cook, Malcolm]

Hi,

Coming late to this fray and responding to original Subject

 

If you

 

(require 'use-package)

 

Then you might find the following to work, as I do:

 

(use-package org

  :ensure org-plus-contrib                             ; following http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/7890/org-plus-contrib-and-org-with-require-or-use-package

;; .. etc

)

 

YMMV,

 

Malcolm

 

From: Emacs-orgmode [mailto:emacs-orgmode-bounces+address@hidden On Behalf Of Kaushal Modi
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2017 5:39 PM
To: Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden>; Alan Schmitt <address@hidden>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [O] is it bad to have both org and org-plus-contrib installed?

 

Hi all,

 

I just discovered a bug in this advice that I suggested earlier in this thread.. I needed to fix the order of packages in the new-ret list that is returned. The bug was that the order of pkgs in new-ret was flipped compared to that in orig-ret.. so I needed to flip it back using reverse.

So just for record, here is the fixed function:

 

;; http://emacs.stackexchange.com/a/26513/115

(defun modi/package-dependency-check-ignore (orig-ret)

  "Remove the `black listed packages' from ORIG-RET.

 

Packages listed in the let-bound `pkg-black-list' will not be auto-installed

even if they are found as dependencies.

 

It is known that this advice is not effective when installed packages

asynchronously using `paradox'. Below is effective on synchronous

package installations."

  (let ((pkg-black-list '(org))

        new-ret

        pkg-name)

    (dolist (pkg-struct orig-ret)

      (setq pkg-name (package-desc-name pkg-struct))

      (if (member pkg-name pkg-black-list)

          (message (concat "Package `%s' will not be installed. "

                           "See `modi/package-dependency-check-ignore'.")

                   pkg-name)

        (push pkg-struct new-ret)))

    ;; Tue Apr 11 17:48:16 EDT 2017 - kmodi

    ;; It's *very* critical that the order of packages stays the same in NEW-RET

    ;; as in ORIG-RET. The `push' command flips the order, so use `reverse'

    ;; to flip the order back to the original.

    ;;   Without this step, you will get errors like below when installing

    ;; packages with dependencies:

    ;;   Debugger entered--Lisp error: (error "Unable to activate package ‘nim-mode’.

    ;;   Required package ‘flycheck-28’ is unavailable")

    (setq new-ret (reverse new-ret))

    new-ret))

(advice-add 'package-compute-transaction :filter-return #'modi/package-dependency-check-ignore)

 

On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:28 AM Thomas S. Dye <address@hidden> wrote:

Alan Schmitt writes:

> Thank you for the suggestion, but I use Spacemacs, which in turn uses
> paradox.
>
> Why couldn't there be an org-contrib package, depending on org? So that
> way org would not be duplicated in two packages.

I've run into the same problem with Spacemacs and would welcome a
solution.

All the best,
Tom

--
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com

--

Kaushal Modi