[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] setting local variables
From: |
Scott Randby |
Subject: |
Re: [O] setting local variables |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Sep 2017 14:42:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 |
On 09/20/2017 12:17 PM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Eric Abrahamsen <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> So, any objection to have all major back-ends ignoring unnumbered trees
>>> from TOC, and make that an Org specificity?
>>
>
>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> OK, now I have read this thread.
>
> I do object to removing unnumbered headers from the toc. It breaks
> documented and used behaviour and aI see no pressing reason to change it. I
> find, for compact documents, it works extremely well to have a toc that has
> no numbers - in fact, in many cases I find numbered tocs even annoying. In
> particular, it works really well in websites, where I use it constantly.
>
> I am sorry that I did not see this earlier - but I really think this change
> should be reverted. If there is a desire to have sections that are not put
> into the toc, it should be separated from the num: and toc: switches and
> depend, for example on properties instead.
>
> The fact that in LaTeX "unnumbered" is linked to the question if something
> is in the toc is some kind of mistake, this behaviour is very specific to
> LaTeX-like systems (including TeXInfo), but it is not a very logical system
> IMO.
>
> Carsten
I have to agree with Carsten. I use unnumbered table of contents all the time
in web pages. Almost all of my Org files that generate web pages have the
following:
#+options: num:nil toc:t
The change should be reverted. I wish I had paid attention to this thread. I
thought it was about something else.
Scott Randby
>
>
>>
>> Sounds good!
>>
>>
>>
>
- Re: [O] setting local variables, (continued)
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Rasmus, 2017/09/06
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/06
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/09/06
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/06
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/09/06
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Rasmus, 2017/09/07
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/07
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Eric Abrahamsen, 2017/09/07
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/10
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Carsten Dominik, 2017/09/20
- Re: [O] setting local variables,
Scott Randby <=
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Kaushal Modi, 2017/09/20
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Carsten Dominik, 2017/09/21
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Rasmus, 2017/09/21
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Carsten Dominik, 2017/09/21
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Nicolas Goaziou, 2017/09/21
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Kaushal Modi, 2017/09/21
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Carsten Dominik, 2017/09/22
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Rasmus, 2017/09/22
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Scott Randby, 2017/09/21
- Re: [O] setting local variables, Eric S Fraga, 2017/09/21