Re: [O] Heading/item insert commands

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Ingo Lohmar <address@hidden> writes:

> What I have in mind for starters:
>
> Add orthogonal internal functions that can handle *all* sensible
> combinations of requirements.  Then rewrite existing commands in terms
> of these, but possibly adding new ones.
>
> I would not want to break any workflows, of course.  But in the *long*
> run, we could rethink if the existing commands and their prefix-arg
> behavior are really what users want, or if we provide other ones by
> default.
>
> Does that sound reasonable, or are there any grave obstacles I did not
> consider, or any hard reasons why such changes could not be accepted?

I think, as a starter, we should discuss and agree on how the UI should
be. IMO, implementation follows, not the other way around.

WDYT?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou