Re: Problem with post-command-idle-hook (which-func.el)

[Tim Van Holder]

> That's because the new which-func.el code uses a new macro
> (defined in subr.el), so you probably recompiled which-func.el
> before reloading the new subr.el.

That's not unlikely; I rarely do a 'make bootstrap' for my daily builds
(I usually make do with "make -C lisp recompile updates; make").
Serves me right I guess :-)

> One detail about the patch, tho: post-command-idle-hook uses a
> customizable idle timeout of post-command-idle-delay which defaults
> to 0.1s, whereas your patch fixes it to 0.5s which I find rather long.

To be honest I didn't check the value of post-command-idle-delay; if
that isn't deprecated along with post-command-idle-hook, it would
of course be a better value to pass.  I didn't want to set it too small
(to avoid unnecessary overhead from the idle function), but if it used
to run at 0.1s, then that's fine.