[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: command-line-args
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: command-line-args |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:07:34 -0500 (CDT) |
Richard Stallman wrote:
To me it seems cleaner always to use command-execute.
It the difficulty of coping with this is substantial,
then maybe we should make a change like the one you propose.
But if it is easy for users to adapt to the current behavior,
then let's not make this change.
I think it is easy to adapt, but I'm willing to be shown
that it's not easy.
I believe the difficulty can be at most the (I believe relatively
small) inconvenience of using:
emacs --eval "(my-function)"
instead of:
emacs -f my-function
One can define a shell alias or similar if one needs this often for
the same function.
(Unless I am misunderstanding something.)
Sincerely,
Luc.
- command-line-args, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2003/09/18
- Re: command-line-args, Stefan Monnier, 2003/09/19
- Re: command-line-args, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/20
- Re: command-line-args, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/09/20
- Re: command-line-args, Katsumi Yamaoka, 2003/09/21
- Re: command-line-args, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/21
Re: command-line-args, Richard Stallman, 2003/09/20