Re: invisible

[Stefan Monnier]

> Yes, but that code not specifically written with the `intangible'
> property in mind will still cause problems in those cases where the
> `intangible' property is necessary and hence still should be rewritten
> with the `intangible' property specifically in mind, regardless.

Hmm... since 99% of the code is not written with `intangible' in mind
and most (if not all) that code would break given some appropriately chosen
addition of `intangible' property in the wrong place, and given the fact
that it's generally pretty difficult to fix that code short of let-binding
inhibit-point-motion-hooks, I'm not sure whether the problem is with that
99% of the code or with the `intangible' feature itself.


        Stefan