[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: diff-yank-handler is evil
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: diff-yank-handler is evil |
Date: |
25 Mar 2004 14:49:51 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
>
> OK, I see that a change to subr.el's yank-handler code broke
> diff-yank-handler about 90% (and I only use the remaining 10%).
>
> I don't see how to fix it with the new yank-handler behavior, so I'll
> disable it for now.
There may be ways to do what you want, or we may need to fix
yank-handlers. But you are not very specific here :-(.
What is the exact effect you want to achieve?
What "old" behaviour of yank-handler did you rely on that is now
broken?
--
Kim F. Storm http://www.cua.dk
- diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Jesper Harder, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/24
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/25
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/27
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Kim F. Storm, 2004/03/28
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/29
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Stefan Monnier, 2004/03/29
- Re: diff-yank-handler is evil, Richard Stallman, 2004/03/25