Re: vc-follow-symlinks confirm message is not read only

[Stefan Monnier]

> find-file-noselect-1 binds inhibit-read-only to t, probably for very
> good reasons.

Well, the reasons aren't good enough to keep it bound that long.

> !     (let ((inhibit-read-only nil))
> !       (run-hooks 'find-file-hook))))
  
That's just very ugly.  We should instead change the scope of the binding
such that it only covers the place where inhibit-read-only should indeed
be t.

When was this problem, introduced?


        Stefan