|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Matching programming language identifiers, not "words" |
Date: | 19 May 2004 12:29:40 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> This part seems suspect - I don't think the fall-through from wordend to > symbeg is intentional. Indeed, that was a bug. > perhaps a new term should be introduced for word+symbol - otherwise the > last part of this paragraph would probably have to read "... if a word- or > symbol-constituent character follows" to be unambiguous. The same goes > for the \_> doc. I think we should distinguish betwen the idea of a character that is "symbol constituent" and a character that has "symbol syntax". Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |