Re: missing GC protection in Fbyte_code

[Richard Stallman]

    > If it is really necessary to gcpro because you call a function that
    > calls Fsignal, we would need to add lots of gcpros all around.

    This isn't gcpro in the normal sense.  The macros involved deal with
    the bytecode stack, not data on the C stack.  It's been several years,
    though, and I don't remember details.

Thanks for the correction.  However, none of this data should ever
be used again in the case where Fsignal is called.