[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3 |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 19:04:34 -0400 |
I see that most of the change is in temacs, which means
it is statically-allocated data, not data allocated by
building Emacs.
If you look at the various .o files with size, I expect
you can find out where the increase really is.
- size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/09/10
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Andreas Schwab, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Andreas Schwab, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/15
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/15
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/15