[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3 |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Sep 2004 22:00:03 -0700 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> If you look at the various .o files with size, I expect
> you can find out where the increase really is.
It looks like all the increase comes from alloc.o, specifically from
"pure".
For temacs from CVS:
(gdb) p sizeof (pure)
$1 = 1980000
for temacs from 21.3:
(gdb) p sizeof(pure)
$1 = 720000
changing the size of "pure" to be the same as in 21.3 makes temacs be
roughly the same size as the 21.3 temacs. But that does not help
because with the smaller size "emacs" cannot be created, it crashes
while loading loadup.el. Trying do decrease "pure" does not work, it
temacs crashes when trying to dump...
Another interesting fact is that the current CVS uses
993528 pure bytes and 21.3 uses 715540 pure bytes.
Yet the sizeof(pure) difference is so much bigger.
- size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/09/10
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/13
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Andreas Schwab, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Stefan Monnier, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Andreas Schwab, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Kim F. Storm, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/15
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Dan Nicolaescu, 2004/09/14
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/09/15
- Re: size increase for CVS emacs vs 21.3, Richard Stallman, 2004/09/15