Re: syntax for ?= in sh-mode

[Richard Stallman]

    With the current Emacs code, successive C-M-f get you to:

        a * b + c * d, e * f, g * h
         ^   ^   ^   ^  ^   ^  ^   ^

    In sml-mode, successive C-M-f do the following:

        a * b + c * d, e * f, g * h
         ^   ^       ^      ^      ^

Is it good for multiple successive C-M-f to go to a different
place from where they would go if you type C-SPC between them?

It's not an outrageous idea, but is it useful enough in practice
to overcome the conceptual cost that C-M-f is more complex?