Re: configure should avoid exec-shield breakage

[David PONCE]

Kim F. Storm wrote:
> David PONCE <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> 
>>WDYT of the following (untested) change to also check that exec-shield
>>is enabled.
> 
> 
> Does it matter ?  
> 
> I would guess that setarch is a noop if it is disabled.
> 
> And what if exec-shield is enabled _after_ you run configure ?
> 

OK.  Good point.

Thanks!

David