[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad change to tooltip.el
From: |
Nick Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: bad change to tooltip.el |
Date: |
Sun, 14 Nov 2004 19:31:02 +1300 |
> Not that I am aware of. I just seems bad practice to have two
> macros with the same name. If, as Stefan suggests, it doesn't make
> much difference, where is the benefit?
>
> The question is undefined until you specify an alternative
> to compare against.
The alternative was implicit: delete those functions in the CL files which
already exist in subr.el or C source.
Nick
Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/16
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Nick Roberts, 2004/11/17
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Dave Love, 2004/11/18
- Re: bad change to tooltip.el, Stefan Monnier, 2004/11/18