Re: extra locale entries

[Dave Love]

Kenichi Handa <address@hidden> writes:

> I agree.  Could you please install a proper change?

No, I can't.

>> Why aren't there language environments for Bengali (bn), Gujarati
>> (gu), Punjabi (pa) and Telugu (te)?  They seem to have script and
>> input method support.
>
> Emacs still can't display those scripts correctly.

Sorry, I must have been looking at the wrong thing.  A while ago I
talked with someone who I thought was organizing work on the other
Indian scripts.  It's a pity if that didn't happen.

By the way, even when there isn't an appropriate language environment,
I think the locales should be filled in to follow what glibc does,
e.g. use utf-8 for those Indian cases.  That's more likely to DTRT
with coding conversion for sub-processes, for instance, for people in
such locales.  Obviously fixing that would be a todo item.