[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file
|
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
|
Subject: |
Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file |
|
Date: |
Wed, 30 Mar 2005 20:22:38 +0900 (JST) |
|
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/22.0.50 (sparc-sun-solaris2.6) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
In article <address@hidden>, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:
>> I think BOM is not that safe because there are many charsets
>> who have normal letters at 0xFE and 0xFF.
>>
> But what are those characters, and are they likely to appear as a pair
> at the beginning of the file, and nowhere else?
Sorry, I don't know.
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, (continued)
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/15
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Dave Love, 2005/03/24
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/25
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Dave Love, 2005/03/25
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/27
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Dave Love, 2005/03/29
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, David Hunter, 2005/03/30
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Jason Rumney, 2005/03/30
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Kenichi Handa, 2005/03/30
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file, Jason Rumney, 2005/03/30
- Re: utf-16 not auto-detected when finding file,
Kenichi Handa <=