Re: Doc for defface does not mention new "default" condition

[Miles Bader]

On 4/13/05, Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> wrote:
> Deep down in "face-spec-choose" we have this:
> 
>         ;; If the condition is `default', that sets the default
>         ;; for following conditions.
>         (if (eq display 'default)
>             (setq defaults thisval)

Hmmm, so _that's_ how things work these days... I remember there was a
bit of an argument about this topic a while back.

So is it basically:  straight cond-style structure (albeit unevaluated
tests), first matching clause is chosen exclusively, _except_ that a
"default" clause sets the defaults and continues searching as above?

-Miles
-- 
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.