[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: more key bindings for xterm
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: more key bindings for xterm |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:07:30 -0700 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> Would it be acceptable to add something like:
> (substitute-key-definition [f29] [C-f5] function-key-map) to xterm.el?
>
> Does any terminal have a real f29 key?
No idea.
> If not, why not just define function-key-map to map
> it unconditionally into C-f5?
How about smaller numbers, like f13? (I think some terminals had
keys up to at least f16)
(S-F1 -> S-F12 are mapped to f13 -> f24)
I'll implement any solution whenever a decision is made to go one way
or another.
--dan
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, (continued)
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/13
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/04/13
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/04/14
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/14
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/04/14
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Dan Nicolaescu, 2005/04/19
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/19
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/20
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/20
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/15
- Re: more key bindings for xterm,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: more key bindings for xterm, Richard Stallman, 2005/04/14