[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: before- and after-string issues
From: |
Kim F. Storm |
Subject: |
Re: before- and after-string issues |
Date: |
Wed, 18 May 2005 23:27:09 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:
> But I also fail to understand why you included text properties in the
> discrimination. before- and after-strings are overlay properties,
> stickyness is a text property. The face of a before-/after-string would
> be affected by stickyness iff you allowed inheritance of face properties
> from ordinary characters to adjacent before-/after-strings.
The new proposal is so complex that I cannot follow the logic -- much
less try to implement it. I doubt it is really necessary to make dramatic
changes here -- the existing logic seems to be "good enough", with a small
tweak for empty overlays.
> This
> (inheritance, yes/no) would have to be decided in the first place. The
> relative order of such strings during display should not be affected by
> stickyness properties. Well, maybe I'm too silly to understand this.
I have an idea what RMS suggests, but I still think it is overkill.
--
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk
- before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/14
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/14
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Kim F. Storm, 2005/05/16
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/18
- Re: before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/18
- Re: before- and after-string issues,
Kim F. Storm <=
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/18
- Re: before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/19
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/20
- Re: before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/23
- Re: before- and after-string issues, Richard Stallman, 2005/05/24
Re: before- and after-string issues, martin rudalics, 2005/05/18