[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:58:46 -0400 |
> Again, it is the only way to get consistent behavior as text is
> killed, copied, and yanked. But you have to know the convention
> and arrange to follow it.
So do you suggest that yank looks for display properties on the text
and somehow ensure that those properties are "made unique"?
I did not suggest any change, just explaining why the mechanism
works the way it does. In reading those messages I did not see
a problem that calls for a change.
- Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/18
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/18
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/19
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/20
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/21
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/22
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/23
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/24
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/23
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Kim F. Storm, 2005/07/23
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Stefan Monnier, 2005/07/21
- Re: Unexpected hiding of identical images, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/07/22