[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
insert-buffer vs insert-buffer-substring
From: |
Juri Linkov |
Subject: |
insert-buffer vs insert-buffer-substring |
Date: |
Tue, 09 Aug 2005 12:00:22 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
`insert-buffer-substring' is not equivalent to `insert-buffer' in regard
to the point position after calling these functions. `insert-buffer' leaves
point before inserted text, but `insert-buffer-substring' - after it.
I just fixed a bug in info.el caused by replacing `insert-buffer' with
`insert-buffer-substring'. Instead of `(insert-buffer-substring buffer)',
I added the following construct:
(goto-char (prog1 (point) (insert-buffer-substring buffer)))
Is it the right replacement? Shouldn't it be documented in the
docstring of `insert-buffer' which currently says:
This function is meant for the user to run interactively.
Don't call it from programs: use `insert-buffer-substring' instead!
which gives the impression that `insert-buffer-substring' is
a complete equivalent of `insert-buffer'.
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
- insert-buffer vs insert-buffer-substring,
Juri Linkov <=