Re: GUD node names

[Juri Linkov]

>  >      > Two GUD-related nodes in the Emacs manual have too general names:
>  >      > `Layout' and `Other Buffers'.
>  > 
>  > I agree that that is unfortunate.
>  > 
>  >     They are not subnodes of GUD but of "GDB Graphical
>  >     Interface".  All the other (GUD) nodes listed with "GDB
>  >     Graphical Interface" apply to a range of debuggers (GDB, DBX,
>  >     PDB, PERLDB etc).
>  > 
>  > This doesn't really change the situation.
>
> No, but it does explain why adding the word `GUD' (Grand Unified Debugger)
> to these names wouldn't be a good idea.                  ^^^^^^^

Sorry, I mistakenly used the word `GUD' in new node names, because the
node `Layout' mentions GUD buffers.

> I didn't know that a menu entry can have three parts.  I have used the term
> GDB-UI on previous occasions.  Perhaps that could be used, although clearly
> it doesn't carry the recognition that the word GUD has.  As in:

Maybe the `-UI' suffix is unnecessary, so the node names
`GDB Window Layout' and `Other GDB Buffers' would be valid and
self-explanatory.

> @menu
> * Window Layout: GDB-UI Window Layout.  Control the number of displayed 
> buffers.
> * Breakpoints Buffer::   A breakpoint control panel.
> * Stack Buffer::         Select a frame from the call stack.
> * Watch Expressions::    Monitor variable values in the speedbar.
> * Other Buffers: Other GDB-UI Buffers.  Input/output, locals, registers, 
> assembler, threads
>                         and memory buffers.
> @end menu

Such three-parts menu items are correct, but they might be too long
on Info browsers that don't hide the second part (the real node name).
If that is ok, then I agree with your menu.

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/