Re: debugging "Lisp nesting exceeds max-lisp-eval-dept" error??

[Kim F. Storm]

"Richard M. Stallman" <address@hidden> writes:

>     If we do that, we might as well delete lazy-lock.el and fast-lock.el
>     rather than leave them in obsolete.
>
> We don't normally delete packages that are obsolete, we normally put
> them in the `obsolete' directory.  Is there a reason to treat these
> differently?
>
> We could delete all the obsolete files, I guess.  Would that be
> better?  I tend to think that having them available as examples
> could be useful for someone--and it does no harm.
>
> To make SURE it does no harm, I will turn off compilation and other
> such processing of the `obsolete' subdir.

How can compiling the functions in obsolete do any harm?

Do you also plan to remove obsolete from load-path?

-- 
Kim F. Storm <address@hidden> http://www.cua.dk